• user03-ExamPen
• Blog

Defying Reason — Questionable Arrests

Outline

1. Introduction
   A. Democracy under stress
   B. Arrests as political tool
2. Misuse of Law
   A. Arbitrary detentions
   B. Weak evidentiary standards
   C. Contradiction with constitutional rights

III. Political Fallout
A. Erodes legitimacy of govt
B. Fuels polarization
C. Undermines public trust

1. Judicial Responsibility
   A. Courts as guardians of rights
   B. Need for stronger judicial oversight
   C. Past precedents of judicial activism
2. Way Forward
   A. End selective justice
   B. Ensure due process
   C. Strengthen rule of law
3. Conclusion
   Justice must be impartial, not political

Expanded Outline

1. Introduction
   The editorial criticizes the government for arrests lacking due process, undermining democratic principles.
2. Misuse of Law
   Arbitrary detentions contradict constitutional guarantees and reflect misuse of law enforcement.

III. Political Fallout
Such actions polarize politics, weaken legitimacy, and reduce trust in institutions.

1. Judicial Responsibility
   Courts must check executive overreach, but often remain passive.
2. Way Forward
   Rule of law demands impartial justice and respect for due process.
3. Conclusion
   Selective accountability erodes democracy.

Vocabulary

Important Facts & Figures

• Pakistan’s Constitution (Article 10) guarantees right to fair trial & safeguards against arbitrary arrest.
• UN Human Rights Committee repeatedly criticized Pakistan’s detention practices.

MCQs

1. Article 10 of Pakistan’s Constitution ensures:
   Freedom of speech b. Right to fair trial c. Religious freedom d. Right to property
   Answer: b. Right to fair trial
2. Arbitrary arrests mainly undermine:
   Economy b. Rule of law c. Diplomacy d. Media
   Answer: b. Rule of law